MBA --- semster IV--- compensation and benefits -- managerial remuneration-- notes
MASTER
OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
SEMESTER 4
COMPENSATION
AND BENEFITS
Unit 10
Managerial Remuneration
Table of
Contents
|
SL No |
Topic |
Fig No /
Table / Graph |
SAQ /
Activity |
Page No |
|
|
1 |
Introduction |
- |
- |
4 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
Objectives |
- |
- |
|
|
2 |
Managerial
Remuneration – Concept and Elements, |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
1, I |
5 - 14 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
Computation of
managerial remuneration |
- |
- |
|
|
|
2.2 |
Types of
managerial remuneration |
- |
- |
|
|
|
2.3 |
Principles of
managerial remuneration |
- |
- |
|
|
|
2.4 |
Compensable
factors of managerial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
remuneration |
- |
- |
|
|
|
2.5 |
Important features of executive compensation |
- |
- |
|
|
|
2.6 |
Elements of
managerial remuneration |
- |
- |
|
|
|
2.7 |
Limits of
remuneration |
- |
- |
|
|
3 |
Executive
Compensation :Methodology |
- |
- |
15 |
|
|
4 |
CEO-to-worker
pay ratio |
- |
2, II |
16 |
|
|
5 |
Rewarding – A
New Approach |
- |
3 |
17 - 18 |
|
|
6 |
Remuneration
Ceilings |
- |
4 |
19 - 20 |
|
|
7 |
Remuneration
Ceilings under Chapter XIII |
- |
5 |
21 - 23 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
Applicability of
remuneration ceiling Schedule |
- |
- |
|
|
|
7.2 |
XIII New
ceiling limits |
- |
- |
|
|
|
7.3 |
Three sections of remuneration ceiling under Section XIII |
- |
- |
|
|
|
7.4 |
Term of service of MD,
whole time Director and
Manager |
- |
- |
|
|
8 |
Benchmark Compensation
Package as per the Industry
Standards |
7, 8 |
6 , III |
23 - 27 |
|
|
9 |
Summary |
- |
- |
28 |
|
|
10 |
Glossary |
- |
- |
29 |
|
|
11 |
Terminal
Questions |
- |
- |
29 |
|
|
12 |
Answers |
- |
- |
30 - 31 |
|
|
13 |
Case Study |
- |
- |
32 - 33 |
|
1.
INTRODUCTION
In the previous unit, you have
studied various concepts of compensation strategies as an integral part of HRM
and its policies with respect to reward excellence, individualising the system
of remuneration, factors affecting the compensation strategies. You also
studied the relevance of compensation strategies as an integral part of HRM and
the compensation policies.
Managers have become the most
critical asset to the success of an organisation. As competition is at a high
peak, firms are now challenging each other in order to motivate, attract and
retain the competent managers for their strategic needs and requirements. Thus,
the demand of such managers have increased manifold after opening up of the
economy.
In this unit, you will learn about the concept and elements
of managerial compensation, it’s rewarding approach, remuneration ceilings
under Section XIII and the benchmark package of compensation as per the
Industry standards.
1.1 Objectives:
After studying this unit, you should be able
to:
❖
Discuss
the concept and elements of Managerial Compensation
❖
Explain
rewarding as a new approach
❖
Describe
the remuneration ceilings under section XIII
❖
Explain
compensation package as per the Industry standards
2.
MANAGERIAL REMUNERATION – CONCEPT AND ELEMENTS
Managerial remuneration is the
salary or the compensation paid to the employees at the managerial level in an
organisation. Section 197 of Companies Act 2013, contains the provisions
related to the compensation of the managers or executives. The compensation and
benefits are kept confidential by the organisation. The scheme of compensation
of top managers or executives must reflect the responsibility and thus, aims at
providing top executives the security to use personal responsibility and taking
decisions courageously.
Now you will understand this with the help
of a case study:
Case Let
Surging Pay Packs (in India) Still Short of
Global Mark
Despite rising salaries in India,
emulating global benchmarks still remains a far cry. Senior finance, marketing
and human resource (HR) executives in India earn less than a fifth of their
counterparts in the US in terms of base and annual total cash, says a study of
salaries in 15 countries by Mercer Human Resource Consulting.
In finance functions, India clearly
falls in the lower end of the salary spectrum along with Hungary. The two
receive less than half of the 15-country average for this position, earning
approximately $60,000 and $55,700, respectively.
US-based finance directors are the
highest paid, earning base pay of $248,700 on average, followed by those in the
UK and Canada, who receive around $201,500 and $190,900, respectively. Their
counterparts in Germany, Hong Kong and Brazil also earn high base pay at
$170,000, $164,300 and $161,200, respectively. Annual total cash for finance
directors follows the same pattern as base pay.
The highest paying country for
marketing directors in Asia is South Korea, with an average base pay of
$176,200. Hong Kong and Japan are in a similar range to each other, paying
$136,200 and $132,000 respectively. Singaporean marketing director can expect
an average base pay of $121,400 slightly behind the above mentioned Asian
countries.
The best-paid HR directors in Asia
are in South Korea and Hong Kong, where their average base-pay is $175,800 and
$157,400 respectively. Singapore at $11,800 and Japan at $129,100 also have
relatively high base-pay compared to other countries in Asia.
“We find higher than average salaries for
HR directors where their role is more strategic and business focused,” added
David Conroy, UK Leader of Reward at Mercer. “Examples are where HR directors
are driving through change programs for their employer and taking a leadership
role in M&A activity.”
Source: Compensation Management, 1st Edition, B.D
Singh, Excel Books
The remuneration of managers is to focus on the performance
in short term as well as sustainability of organisational development in long
run. Hence, the managerial reunion aims at motivating top executives or
managers to research for potentials in cost cutting and focusing in performance
growth and sales from the prospective of long-run. This helps the shareholders
understand the benefits of getting involved in the organisation. Thus, you may find managers at different level in
the organisation as shown in the below figure 10.1:
Source:
Compensation Management, 1st Edition, Er
Soni Shyam Singh, Excel Books
Figure 10.1: Diagram of Different
Class of Executives
Hence, there are different levels of manager who are regarded
as key players of an organisation. The main objective here is to achieve the
goals of the organisation as well as to cultivate the best labour force to
maximise the profitable returns on investment.
2.1
Computation of Managerial Remuneration
As per the needs of Schedule V of the SEBI (LODR)
Regulations, 2015 , the remuneration structure of the managers is categorised
as follows:
•
Salary
•
Commission
•
Allowances
•
Contribution of superannuation, gratuity and
provident funds
•
Monetary value of different perks
There are several other benefits or perks which are given by
the organisation to their managers/executives. Some of them are as follows:
•
Any expense which is incurred by the
organisation in creating insurance on the life of the managers.
•
Concessional emoluments
•
Any expense which is incurred by the
organisation by giving them an annuity or free rent accommodation
•
Any expense with respect to any commitment paid.
2.2
Types Of Managerial Remuneration
Due to financial crises in the last two decades, the
remuneration part of the managers has changed drastically which affect their
compensation structure. Thus, managerial remuneration comprises of two
important pays which are as follows:
1.
Short term pay: The short term
remuneration is related to the bonuses (short term) and the base pay which are
usually paid to the managers according to their performance in the
organisation. This type of pay is totally cash based managerial remuneration
component and over a certain period of time these bonuses become deferred.
2.
Long term pay: The long term
remuneration comprises of stocks which are restricted, stock options, salary
which depend on the performance against the index and shares.
These long term remuneration elements are used by the
shareholders in order to protect the organisation’s value as well as gaming
control of the top level managers on the rising value of the firm in the
marketplace.
According to the latest report, Table 10.1
shows the figures of managerial
remuneration in India:
|
Name
(Mr.) |
Company |
Designation
|
Compensation
(` in
Lakh) |
|
Mukesh D. Ambani |
Reliance Industries |
CMD |
2,451.00 |
|
Brijmohan
Munjal |
Hero Honda |
Chairman |
1,558.23 |
|
Pawan Munjal |
Hero Honda |
MD & CEO |
1,522.31 |
|
Naveen Jindal |
Jindal Steel & Power |
Exec. VC & MD |
1,354.21 |
|
Sunil B. Mittal |
Bharti Airtel |
CMD |
1,267.59 |
|
Miki Yamamoto |
Hero Honda |
Joint MD |
1,263.69 |
|
Takao Eguchi |
Hero Honda |
Whole Time Director |
1,255.17 |
|
Kalanithi Maran |
Sun TV |
CMD |
1,113.00 |
|
Kaveri Kalanithi |
Sun TV |
Joint MD |
1,026.00 |
|
A.J. Agarwal |
Mercator Lines |
Joint MD |
1,007.25 |
Source: Compensation Management text and cases, 1st
Edition, Tanmoy Deb, Excel Books
Table 10.1. Managerial Remuneration in
India
2.3
Principles Of Managerial Remuneration
Now you will be able to understand various principles of
managerial compensation which are as follows:
•
Company must focus on the generation of profits
•
The scheme of remuneration must be for the long
term
•
Risk management
•
Motivate executives by giving them high and
attractive bonuses and perks
•
The scheme of remuneration must comprise of a
Balance Scorecard
•
Non-cash emphasis on remuneration (share
phantom, stock options and shares schemes)
2.4
Compensable Factors Of Managerial Remuneration
The remuneration packages which are decided by the
organisations comprise of certain factors which are shown in figure 10.2:
Source:
Compensation Management text and cases,
1st Edition, Tanmoy Deb, Excel Books
Figure 10.2: Diagram of Factors affecting Executive Compensation
Thus, above figure depicts that under certain conditions the
compensation system of the managers rely upon proxies like price of the share
or profit of corporate in order to evaluate the executive performance under
certain factors such as transition in the nature of work, efficient
benchmarking so as to ascertain the going rate of managerial remuneration, investor’s
confidence, retaining and attracting high performers, compensation system of managers
must drive the right manager behaviours which can withstand the questions of
governance and scrutiny of the stakeholder.
2.5
Important Features Of Executive Compensation
The important features of the executive
compensation are as follows:
1.
The comparison cannot be made between executive
compensation and salary and wage schemes which are meant for the employees of
non –managerial position in the firm.
2.
Managers refused to take the privilege of having
collective bargaining and union and also their contribution and competencies
are regarded as their motivational strength for maintaining their salary
packages.
3.
One of the most important features in managerial
remuneration is maintaining the secrecy because no two executives within the
same firm in the same grade receive the same salary in the private firms.
4.
Compensation of executives is guided by pay surveys,
job description, pay grade, and job evaluation.
5.
The pay of the executive is not meant to be the
measurement of the individual performance but rely relatively on the
performance of organisation. Thus, this is only due to the executive’s own
performance which can be directly reflected in measuring and evaluating
performance of the corporate.
2.6
Elements Of Managerial Remuneration
Managerial remuneration are associated with the people who
have attained top level managerial positions such as Directors, Presidents,
General Manager, Vice President etc. Now you will able to understand the main
elements of managerial remuneration which are as follows:
1. Base salaries: It is the first
element of the managerial remuneration which is analysed with the help of Job
Evaluation and also serves as incentives also. While evaluating the salary, Job
Evaluation is just a part of it. An executive is compensated on the basis of his
competencies and also the performance of his/her work. CEO’s base salary is determined
with the help of benchmarking which is based on the Industry Salary Surveys.
Size is usually calculated with the help of revenues of the organisation.
Managerial Compensation may varies from –
❖
industry type
❖
job type
❖
region of the country
❖
organisation size
2.
Special package of perquisites and benefits:
Managers also enjoy all kinds of benefits and perquisites which the
organisations offer to their employees. Therefore, in order to maximise the
availability of time to key managers from the purpose of business perspective,
various other facilities are also offered to them such as connection of
internet, connection of cell phone and so on.
3.
Profit sharing bonus: In today’s
global competitive scenario, in the programme of executive payments, Profit
sharing bonus plays a very important role. This type of bonus is usually based
on the profit sharing or performance.
4.
Short term bonuses: Such type of
bonuses ranges from 50% of the base salary to 10 or more times of the base
salary are offered when firm a very good year had by recognising the financial
indicators.
5.
Long term performance bonus: Here
the payment of cash to the corporate managers is similar to that of the short
term bonuses. The only difference you may find is in the time period for
receipt is 2 years or more into the future and the award size is based on the
multiyear achievement of established performance related objectives.
6.
Stock options: Now a day many firms
offer “stock equivalences” in the form of share appreciation rights/phantom
shares. Here recipients are compensated with a stock increased value that is
further determined by the base valuation which is prepared when share
appreciation rights/phantom shares are given.
7.
Severance packages: These types of
packages are also known as Golden Handshake which is financial remuneration and
incentive packages which if given to those employees in the organisations who
are retired or laid off. This package includes:
❖
life and health insurance
❖
retirement benefits
❖
stock options
❖
remuneration for vacation days or unused sick
❖
Assistance for job placement
Now you will be able to understand with
the help of following example the “Executive
Compensation at Infosys Technologies”
Example: “Executive Compensation at
Infosys Technologies”
Particulars of compensation and other
incentives provided to key management people (Directors and Statutory Officers)
during the year ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 are shown in Table 10.2 below.
|
Name |
Salary |
Contributions
to provident & other funds |
Perquisites
and incentives |
Total remuneration (` In
crores) |
|
Chairman & Chief
Mentor N.R. Narayana Murthy |
0.05
0.13 |
0.02 0.03 |
0.21 0.26 |
0.28 0.42 |
|
CEO & MD Nandan M. Nilekani |
0.14 0.13 |
0.04 0.03 |
0.33 0.25 |
0.51 0.41 |
|
President,
COO & JMD S. Gopalakrishnan |
0.14 0.13 |
0.04 0.03 |
0.34 0.26 |
0.52 0.42 |
|
Whole time director K. Dinesh |
0.14 0.13 |
0.04 0.03 |
0.33 0.25 |
0.51 0.41 |
|
Whole
time director S.D. Shibulal |
0.13 0.70 |
0.04 0.01 |
0.29 0.31 |
0.46 1.02 |
|
Whole
time director T.V. Mohandas Pai |
0.24 0.19 |
0.08 0.04 |
0.60 0.53 |
0.92 0.76 |
|
Whole time director
Srinath Batni |
0.21 0.17 |
0.06 0.04 |
0.51 0.47 |
0.78 0.68 |
|
CFO V. Balakrishnan |
0.17 0.13 |
0.05 0.03 |
0.56 0.38 |
0.78 0.54 |
Source: Infosys Annual
Report 2006 – 07
Table 10.2 Particulars of Compensation
2.7
Limits Of Remuneration
The following
table 10.3 shows the limits of remuneration of managers.
Table 10.3: Limits of Remuneration of Managers
|
Maximum Limit |
According to companies Act
1956 Section 198, any private or public organisation which is a subsidiary of
public company must pay 11% of its net profit of any financial year executive
remuneration to its directors which comprises of any manager and whole time
or managing director. |
|
Minimum Limit |
According to Section 269
of schedule XIII of Companies Act 1988 in case An organisation in financial
year has no profits or inadequate profits, an organisation will not pay to
its directors which comprises of any manager and whole time or managing
director any remuneration except the one which is previously approved by the
Central Government. |
Now you will able to understand the maximum
limit of the compensation which is paid to the managers with the help of
following table 10.4:

Table 10.4: Maximum Limit of Managerial Remuneration

|
Condition
|
Limit |
|
If there is only one managing director |
11% |
|
If more than one managing director |
5% |
|
If there is only one MD |
10% |
|
If there is only part time directors only and has no MD |
3% |
|
If there is pert time directors and also have one or more
MD |
1% |
|
If there is manager |
5% |
Source:
http://www.lexvidhi.com/article-details/managerial-remuneration-undercompanies-act-1956-26.html

3.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION: METHODOLOGY
For companies with no CEO, the
president or similar top executive is used. Where two names appear, the company
has co-CEOs.
Salary
is base salary.
Bonus
is the annual cash incentive payment.
Per
Cent Change is the change from 2010’s total salary and bonus. No number is
shown if the CEO was not in the same position for all of the years.
Other
includes all other payments and the cash value of perquisites and benefits.
Share-Based Awards is the total value of shares, share units, trust
units or similar long-term incentive plan grants.
Option-Based Awards is the estimated value of stock options or
similar trust unit rights granted in current year.
Pension Value is the additional annual value of the pension benefit
earned by the CEO in current year.
Per Cent Change is the change from current year total compensation.
No number is shown if the CEO was not in the same position for all of previous
year and current year.
Unexercised In-The-Money Options is the value of stock options held
by the CEO at the end of the fiscal year.
Unvested Share-Based Awards is the value of share units or similar
compensation that has not yet met time or performance conditions required for
payout.
Value Of CEO’S Equity is the value of all equity held by the CEO,
including shares and vested share units, but excluding unexercised stock
options.
Accrued
CEO Pension Obligation is the estimated value of a company’s total cost to
provide the CEO’s defined benefit pension.
4.
CEO-TO-WORKER PAY RATIO
To calculate the CEO-to-worker pay ratio
for a firm we divide the compensation of the firm’s CEO by the estimated annual
compensation for the typical worker in that firm’s key industry.
There are two possible approaches to
obtaining the CEO-to-worker compensation ratio for the group of the 350 largest
firms. The first is by computing the average CEO compensation and then dividing
this by the average annual compensation of typical workers in those firms’ key
industries. This might be called the “ratio of the averages” method. The second
approach is to average the ratios computed for each firm, which can be labeled
the “average of the ratios” method. This method is only available if one has the
firm-level data.
Activity
II
Some MNC of
Canada wish to start its subsidiary at capital of MP, for which executive mix
is proposed to be a technical
expert from Canada, Marketing head from America, manufacturing professionals
from Canada, India and supervisors from MP. Salaries of
Americans and Canadians at Canada
are 5000 and 4500 U.S. Dollars, respectively, while counter parts in India at
Indian industries are drawing ` 35,000.
Executive
levels operating from MP can be made available @ ` 10,000 and maximum 20,000.
Product cost when manufactured at Bhopal is going to
cost 45% of the cost at Canada in terms of rupees. Company has hired you as HR
consultant and wish to design a suitable compensation structures to ensure
cross cultural and intercontinental harmony. What packages to be offered to
Americans, Canadians and
Indian
executive to avoid disputes?
Self-Assessment
Questions - 2
4.
The ___________
comprises of stocks which are restricted, stock options, salary
which depend on the performance against
the index and shares.
5.
Secrecy must be considered as one of the important
factor while maintaining the managerial remuneration. (True/False)
5. REWARDING
– A NEW APPROACH
Nowadays, rewarding is considered
as one of the most powerful and new approach of retention strategy. In such a
competitive environment, where there is high growth, many doors of
opportunities have opened for the employees to switch job from one organisation
to another. This leads to increase in the cost and complexity of retaining the
competent employees in the organisation.
The following are some features of
rewarding:
1.
New ways of pay: Due to competitive
scenario, many organisations are connecting their Variable Pay Plans (VPPs) to
the organisation’s individual and team performance. The nature and degree of
connection may vary from level to level within the firm itself. Many firms have
effectively and lucratively implemented the Variable Pay Plans (VPPs) which
includes team or individual performance which is based on Stock Options,
productivity based company’s benefits, profit sharing etc. As short term is
benefits are regarded as a good method to connect the goals of the organisation
with the rewards of the individuals whereas on the other hand benefits for long
term are usually given to the senior level executives’ within the firm.
2.
Emerging trends: Modifications in
the roles and responsibilities of middle level management have become the most
emerging trend for the organisation. Lack of personnel in the organisation
makes its impact on the remuneration structures. Therefore, this has led the
firms to communicate, understand and articulate the middle management’s role
and opportunities for the development of their career.
3.
Pay for performance: In India, the
remuneration part of the top executives is tied up with the corporate and
individual performances. Boards of Directors (BOD) are continuously paying as
per their performances. Thus, they are exercising tight controls over the
remuneration that is from the guidelines of stock ownership to the convent
which helps in preventing the managers from gaining the stock options. Now the
organisations are shifting the remuneration for their top level managers from
their basic pay to stock options grants and bonuses. Organisations have started
trimming the pay that is offered to the top executives by the components of Pay
for Performance.
4.
Equity over cash: In the
compensation package, “Equity” is regarded as one of the most common form of
stock options where equity is given in the type of outright awards of stock as
well as restricted stock.
Example: 60% of the compensation package in KPMG’s
Chinnagos is given in the form of equity. Their compensation part breaks down
as –20% of base salary, 20% benefits/incentives which is given more in cash
rather than in Stock and 60% of stock options.

6.
REMUNERATION CEILINGS
According to Section 198 (1), the
remuneration ceiling is the total maximum executive compensation in case of
inadequate or absence of profits. The total executive remuneration is offered
by the private or public firms to its directors on account of any financial
year which shall not exceed 11% of the organisations net profit for that
particular year.
Director’s Remuneration will not be
deducted from the gross profits. Thus, compensation is payable to all the whole
time/managing director or managers or directors in any capacity. Therefore, it
comprises of the compensation for the services which is served by him/her in
any other capacity rather than that of the Directors.
Following are the ceilings and regulations of the managerial
remuneration which are as follows:
1.
To raise the compensation which is payable to the
organisation’s executive personnel
2.
To offer increased compensation without approval by the
government
3.
To fix compensation of whole- time and managing
director
4.
To raise the sitting fees of the top level executives
(Directors) beyond given limits for attending the Board or Committee meetings.
5.
To pay as well as appoint the managerial personnel
without taking the approval from government
6.
To compensate Directors by offering 1% or 3% of the
organisations net profit.
7.
To pay compensation in excess of 1% or 3% from the
organisations net profit to the top level executives
8.
To compute depreciation for reaching the net profits
for purposes of executive compensation.
9.
To remunerate the Director or whole time/managing
director for holding the manager’s office for loss of office etc.
10. To
compensate the Directors with a transfer of shares in case of loss of office
etc.
11. To
pay compensation in excess of the normal ceiling to the expatriate director
under the guidelines of the Executive Remuneration.
12. To
pay minimum compensation to the whole time/managing director or managers or
directors in case when organisation is sick.

7.
REMUNERATION CEILING UNDER SECTION XIII
Remuneration ceiling under Section
XIII of the Companies Act 1956 was established with the primary goal of finding
the approval by the Central government in order to offer compensation to their
whole time/managing director. It deals with the compensation limits of the
Executive Personnel which are underwent with amendment in order to facilitate
the fixation of liberalised limits of the remuneration without Central
Government approval.
Managing Director must be entrusted
with the power either by Article of Association or a resolution passed at a
board or general meeting or by an agreement.
Manager must be in charge of the whole management and
exercise the powers which are conferred on him as a subject to direction,
superintendence and control of the Board of the company. Whole time Director
includes a director in the employment of whole time of the organisation and
spends his lifetime in the management of the organisation.
7.1
Applicability of Remuneration Ceiling Schedule
XIII
Under Section198 and 269, the provisions related to Section
XIII are applicable only to Private firms and Public firms. The provisions made
under Section XIII are not applicable to Government organisations. Schedule
XIII is divided into 3 parts which are as follows:
1.
Deals with appointment and qualification of the
executive personnel
2.
Deals with the remuneration payable
3.
Deals with the needs and requirements such as approval
of shareholders and certificate of compliance which is to be obtained from
Company Secretary or Auditor.
7.2
New Ceiling Limits
Various conditions which are discussed for applying various
limits of ceiling in Section II of the Schedule XIII are broadly comprised of
the following:
(a) Cases
where neither Special Resolution nor approval from Central government is
essential: Here the maximum compensation paid by an organisation which
has inadequate profits or no profits depend on the capital which shall not
exceed ` 2 Lakhs per month or ` 24 Lakhs per annum.
(b) Cases
where the approval from Government is not mandatory but approval through
special resolution is required for the remuneration payment: Here
eligible organisations are entitled to fix the higher limits of ceiling.
(c)
Cases where the approval from both special resolution
and Central Government is required
7.3
Three Sections of Remuneration Ceiling Under
Section XIII
There are three sections of remuneration
ceiling under Section XIII. These are as follows:
Section 1: Compensation
by the organisation having profits (where there is one executive person then
maximum limit will be 5% of the net profit; on the other hand, where there are
more than one executive then maximum limit will be 10% of the net profit)
Section 2: Compensation by the
organisations which are having inadequate or no profits
![]() |
Section 3: The compensation and appointment of the executive personnel is subject to the approval from the shareholder’s at the time of general meeting.
7.4
Term of Service Of MD, Whole Time Director And
Manager
According to remuneration ceiling under
Section XIII the term of service of MD, Whole time Director and Manager are as
follows:
Managing Director (MD): According to
Section 317 requires maximum 5 years at a time
Whole time Director: According to
Company’s Act 1956 no limit is predetermined Manager: According to
Section 388, maximum 5 years at a time
8.
BENCHMARK COMPENSATION PACKAGE AS PER THE
INDUSTRY
Benchmarking of compensation
package as per the industry standards establishes the grades or ranges,
standardised method of appraisal, payment and valuation and the central
systems. This helps in reducing the scope of conflicts and disputes as well as
also helps in managing the remuneration smoothly.
Thus, benchmarking the compensation package helps in
establishing the most acceptable and minimum elements of remuneration by
keeping in mind the criteria involved in Government Legislation, competitive
requirement and ability of the organisation to pay.
Thus, following essentials are required in
benchmarking:
Wage and salary survey benchmarking
Before
planning or conducting any salary/wage surveys, the firm must benchmark:
•
Evaluation method
•
Survey objective
•
Collection of data
Job benchmarking
Job benchmarking is the minimum
possible differentiation in the firm with respect to the stabilisation and
standardisation. Firms must interpret the eligibility, designations and
authorities for different management levels. Therefore, here is the responsibility
of the employers to make them aware of the job contents which help in reducing
conflicts and disputes. Thus, benchmarking related to the compensation,
compensation policy as well as job stabilise the demand and supply of jobs in
the marketplace and hence, helps in making survey easier for pay comparison.
This can be seen in table 10.5.
Table 10.5: Job benchmarking
|
Mgt.
Level |
Executive
Level |
Administration
Level |
Manufacturing Level |
Workers
Level |
|
Top |
• President
• Vice-President
|
• CEO • Ch. Admn.
|
• Works
Mgr. • Project Mgr. |
• Highly
skilled • Job
setters |
|
|
• CEO |
• Project
Mgr. |
• GM (works) |
|
|
Middle |
• Sr. Mgrs.
• Div.
Mgrs. |
• Admn.
Mgr. • Security
Mgr. |
• Production
Mgr. • Engg/Design
Mgr. |
• Skilled • Semi-skilled
|
|
|
• Mgrs. |
|
• Quality Mgr. |
|
|
Operating |
• Sr. Exe. • Supervisors |
• Data
Processor • Word
processors |
• Inspectors
• Shop
Supervisor |
• Unskilled
• Casual |
|
|
• Executives
|
• Peons/messengers
|
• Section Heads |
|
Source: Compensation Management, 1st Edition, Er
Soni Shyam Singh, Excel Books
Compensation elements/components benchmarking
Before designing the elements of
the compensation as well as their significance, the criteria for each element
of the remuneration/compensation must be benchmark by an organisation which is
shown in following table 10.6:
Table 10.6: Elements of Compensation
and Benchmarking
|
Compensation
components |
|
Basic
benchmarking criteria |
|
• Basic |
• |
Min. as per legislation and Job worth |
|
• DA |
• |
Based on local CPI |
|
• City compensatory
allowance |
• |
Matching std. of living and purchasing power |
|
• HRA |
• |
Rental
values a nd accommodation to suit status of the employee |
|
• Conveyance
Allowance |
• |
Taxi rates of city |
|
• Other
Perks & Fringes |
• |
As per co.’s policy and strategy. |
Source: Compensation Management, 1st Edition, Er
Soni Shyam Singh, Excel Books
Clarifying and Obtaining Commitments
The main objective of the
compensation management is proper utilisation of its personnel in order to
ensure industrial peace and harmony as well as earn prestige and profits for
the organisation. Remuneration is regarded as a very crucial matter not only
from the employer’s point of view but also from the employees. Thus, in order
to be effective, commitment from both the sides is required for attaining the
goals of the organisation.
Commitment from employer: It
includes the following:
•
understandable and clarity in the policy of
compensation
•
economic and social well – being of the
employees
•
justifiable and fair salary/wage structures
•
accurate and transparency assessment for
appraisal
•
opportunities to learn more as when required Commitment
from employee: It includes:
•
being loyal and honest to the firm
•
providing worth at place of work
•
sharing responsibilities for organizational and
self growth and development

9.
SUMMARY
Let us recapitulate the important concepts
discussed in this unit:
•
The compensation part of the top Managerial
positions is precise and special compensation and benefits are kept
confidential by the organisation.
•
Managerial remuneration are considered for those
people who have attained top level managerial positions such as Directors,
Presidents, General Manager, Vice President etc.
•
Rewarding is regarded as one of the most
powerful and new approach of retention strategy.
•
According to Section 198 (1) states the
remuneration ceiling as the total maximum Executive Compensation in case of
inadequate or absence of profits.
•
Remuneration ceiling under Section XIII of the
Companies Act 1956 was established with the primary goal of finding the
approval by the Central government in order to offer compensation to their
whole time/managing director.
•
Benchmarking of compensation package establishes
the grades or ranges, standardised method of appraisal, payment and valuation
and the central systems.
10.
GLOSSARY
Employee stock options: A
common stock which is offered by an organisation to its employees as a part of
his/her compensation package.
Job benchmarking: The
minimum possible differentiation in the firm with respect to the stabilisation
and standardisation.
Managerial remuneration:
Long term as well as short term financial as well as non – financial rewards
which are given to the top level managers under certain contractual and legal
mandate.
Remuneration ceiling:
Compensation limits of the Executive Personnel which are underwent with
amendment in order to facilitate the fixation of liberalised limits of the
remuneration without Central Government approval.
Severance package: Also known as Golden Handshake which is
financial remuneration and incentive packages which if given to those employees
in the organisations who are retired or laid off.
11.
TERMINAL QUESTIONS
1.
Explain managerial remuneration. Highlight its limit
and factors affecting the managerial remuneration.
2.
What are the types of managerial remuneration?
3.
List out main components of managerial remuneration.
4.
“Rewarding is regarded as one of the most powerful and
new approach of retention strategy.” Explain.
5.
Explain some of the ceilings of the managerial
remuneration.
6.
Elucidate the new remuneration ceiling limits under
Schedule XIII.
7.
What are the essentials required by the industry in
benchmarking the compensation package?
12.
ANSWERS
Self Assessment Questions
1.
a. Special package of perquisites and benefits
b. Profit Sharing Bonus
c.. Short term Bonus
d. Stock Options
2.
pay surveys, job description, pay grade, and job
evaluation
3.
Logical intricacy
4.
Long term remuneration
5.
True
6.
Variable Pay Plans (VPPs)
7.
True
8.
Equity
9.
False
10.
To compensate Directors by offering 10% of the
organisations net profit
11.
Compensation
12.
Deals with Retirement
13.
Central Government
14.
False
15.
Clarity in compensation policy
16.
Job Benchmarking
17.
True
Terminal Questions
1.
The compensation part of the Top Managerial positions
is precise and special compensation and benefits are kept confidential by the
organisation. For more details, refer to section 2.
2.
Due to financial crises in the last two decades, the
remuneration part of the managers has changed drastically which affect their
compensation structure. For more details, refer to section 2.
3.
Managerial remuneration are considered for those people
who have attained top level managerial positions such as Directors, Presidents,
General Manager, Vice President etc. For more details, refer to section 2.
4.
In such a competitive environment and also where there
is high growth has open many doors of opportunities for the employees to switch
job from one organisation to another. For more details, refer to section 3.
5.
The total Executive Remuneration is offered by the
private or public firms to its directors on account of any financial year which
shall not exceed 11% of the organisations net profit for that particular year.
For more details, refer to section 10.4.
6.
There are various conditions under which various limits
of ceiling in Section II of the Schedule XIII are defined. For more details,
refer to section 5.
7.
Benchmarking of compensation package establishes the
grades or ranges, standardised method of appraisal, payment and valuation and
the central systems. For more details, refer to section 6.
13.
CASE STUDY
Team-based Compensation: The HR Manager's
Dilemma
Mr. Samrat Bhattacharya joined
Forgewell Auto Ltd., New Delhi recently as HR Manager. Forgewell Auto Ltd. is a
manufacturer and supplier of safety critical automotive components which finds
application in steering and suspension assemblies of passenger cars. It
supplies to major OEMs in India and abroad. The company has modest turnover of
40 crores annually and is in business for the last twenty years.
Samrat was very enthusiastic and
wanted to bring about many changes in the HR policies and systems of the
organisation. He began by studying the various systems and practices in place.
During a conversation with Mr. S.N. Hassija, the head of production, he found
that the productivity of the workforce was lower than its competitors. With
this cue, he started looking at HR practices in place.
He noted that the compensation
management in the organisation hovered around rewarding individual performance
although the nature of work was team based. So, one of the first things Samrat
wanted to do in his new position at Forgewell Auto Ltd. was to improve
productivity through team work at every level of the organisation. As the new
HR manager, Samrat set out to change the culture to accommodate the team-based
approach to compensation. He had become so enthusiastic in his most recent
position.
Samrat decided to change
Forgewell’s long standing policy had been to give all employees the same annual
pay increase but Samrat felt that in the new term environment outstanding
performance should be the criterion for pay rises. After consulting with CEO
Vikas Mohanty, Samrat sent a memo to all employees announcing the change to
team based pay for performance.
The reaction was immediate and 100%
negative. None of the employees was happy with the change. They complained that
this will result in partiality in rewarding employees given that the
performance appraisal system in the organisation is quite old and primitive.
Some of the shop floor supervisors started suspecting the intentions of the new
HR Manager as they thought that pay-for performance was a veil to disturb the
harmony prevailing amongst the employees. Samrat and Vikas arranged a meeting
for early the next morning in his office over their tea, they began a painful
debate. Should the new policy be retracted as quickly as it was adopted, or
should it be allowed to stand?
Questions
1.
Do you agree with Samrat’s idea of pay-for-performance
plan? Why or why not?
2.
What advice would you give Samrat and Vikas as they
consider their decision?
3.
What mistakes did they make in adopting and
communicating the new compensation plan?
Source:
Compensation Management text and cases,
1st Edition, Tanmoy Deb, Excel Books)
References:
•
B. D. Singh. (2007). Compensation and Reward
Management. Excel Books Pvt. Ltd.
•
Mousumi S. Bhattacharya Nilanjan Sengupta.
(2009). Compensation Management.
Excel Books Pvt. Ltd.
•
Er. Soni Shyam Singh. (2008), Compensation
Management. Excel Books Pvt. Ltd.
E-References:
•
http://www.simplehrguide.com/executive-compensation.html/
Retrieved on 24 July 2012, Time: 01:50 PM.
•
http://www.lexvidhi.com/article-details/managerial-remuneration-undercompanies-act-1956-26.html
Retrieved on 24 July 2012, Time: 04:25 PM.
•
http://www.citeman.com/13799-managerial-compensation.html Retrieved on 25 July 2012, Time: 10:38 PM.
•
http://www.caclubindia.com/forum/managerial-remuneration-ceiling-a-useful-link112880.asp
Retrieved on 25 July 2012, Time: 12:10 PM.
•
http://www.caclubindia.com/experts/managerial-remuneration-338615.asp
Retrieved on 25 July 2012, Time: 02:49 PM.
•
http://220.227.161.86/11489p829-835.pdf
Retrieved on 25 July 2012, Time: 04:21 PM.

Comments
Post a Comment